Comments on: It’s fish massacre, clearly http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/ Blog of a sleepy dormouse Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:12:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5 By: Li-Li http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/#comment-870 Li-Li Sat, 27 May 2006 19:21:54 +0000 http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/#comment-870 Hehe, it is indeed rather amusing! =P Yes I'm not sure how they tagged the fish - hopefully not using those huge yellow tags, as that would just make the whole thing too silly =P Hehe, it is indeed rather amusing! =P

Yes I’m not sure how they tagged the fish - hopefully not using those huge yellow tags, as that would just make the whole thing too silly =P

]]> By: Andrew http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/#comment-588 Andrew Mon, 15 May 2006 17:15:44 +0000 http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/#comment-588 How did they tag the fish? Did they catch them? If the fish are stupid enough to get caught, they're stupid enough to get eaten :-) How did they tag the fish? Did they catch them? If the fish are stupid enough to get caught, they’re stupid enough to get eaten :-)

]]> By: Eekers http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/#comment-492 Eekers Sat, 13 May 2006 18:54:06 +0000 http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/#comment-492 Made me chuckle! :D I am surprised they didnt tag 18 fish at the local aquarium to reduce the impact on the natural chain of events ;) Made me chuckle! :D I am surprised they didnt tag 18 fish at the local aquarium to reduce the impact on the natural chain of events ;)

]]> By: Yuko :) http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/#comment-491 Yuko :) Sat, 13 May 2006 14:06:30 +0000 http://www.glisglis.co.uk/2006/05/13/its-fish-massacare-clearly/#comment-491 omg!!!! so... 8 1/2 fish were eaten up in 21 days in the study eh?? shocking!!!! it's always good to find a statistically significant result which stands up to scrutiny, isn't it?? hee hee ;)) omg!!!! so… 8 1/2 fish were eaten up in 21 days in the study eh??

shocking!!!!

it’s always good to find a statistically significant result which stands up to scrutiny, isn’t it?? hee hee ;))

]]>